|
Insurance Journal
By Andrew G. Simpson, Jr.
February 23, 2005
The decisions of two of the largest insurance brokers to sell off
their wholesale divisions is a reaction to the Spitzer investigations and could
be a sign of more to come, according to insurance merger specialists.
"This is absolutely
defensive," said Kevin Donaghue,
managing director, Mystic Capital Advisors Group in New York, in
reacting to the news that Willis Group Holdings is selling its
Stewart Smith unit to American Wholesale Insurance Group Inc.
and Aon is shopping
its wholesaler, Swett
& Crawford.
Donaghue said that the brokers
who own their own wholesale divisions are "clearly looking to
get around the conflict of interest" concerns raised by New York
Attorney General Eliot Spitzer in his charges against giant
broker Marsh. Faced with expectations that they disclose to
clients if they place business with their own wholesaler and
further explain why they selected their own wholesaler over
competitors, some brokers are looking to just avoid any
potential conflict, Donaghue
believes.
Steven Wevodau, chief
executive officer of WFG Capital Advisors of Harrisburg, Penn.,
agrees that the charges and investigations by Spitzer and state
attorneys general have "cast a different light" on brokerage
operations.
"I do expect to see some
repositioning mainly because of the Spitzer and attorneys
general investigations," said Wevodau, who sees brokers
returning to their basic business model.
Wevodau expects that the
"lemming effect" will probably come into play, whereby other
brokers follow the lead of those that have already decided to
relinquish their wholesale divisions. He thinks brokers may also
rethink their ownership of other entities as well, pointing to
Aon's decision late
last year to sell all of its interest in the Bermuda-based
specialty insurer, Endurance.
The broker at the center of
the Spitzer charges, Marsh & McLennan, owns its own wholesaler,
Crump. Wevodau thinks Marsh may eventually follow the direction
set by Willis and Aon
and seek to sell Crump. A Marsh spokeswoman said the firm won't
comment on rumors.
The defensive nature of the
transactions could mean some sellers may not get top price for
their wholesalers, Donaghue
added.
Wevodau, however, thinks it
is far from a "fire sale" and that sellers will still get
traditionally high values.
As for potential buyers,
Donaghue noted that
Brown & Brown, the Florida-based broker, continues to be in a
buying mode and tends to "march to its own drum" in building its
insurance distribution network.
In addition to Brown &
Brown, Wevodau would not be surprised if some super regional
banks or a firm like BISYS
take interest in a wholesale unit.
Another possible acquirer:
employees. Insiders suggested that's a possibility for
Swett & Crawford.
Whether the largest brokers
choose to divorce themselves from their wholesalers remains to
be seen but even without that happening there is likely to be
activity surrounding the wholesale segment.
"Wholesalers are definitely in
play," said Donaghue,
referring to the overall insurance mergers and acquisitions
environment.
|