Home :
Research & Resources :

Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers' Quarterly
Benefit Management and Administration Insurance Index
Group medical coverage rates continued to
rise for employers of all sizes according to the fall
Employee Benefits Market Survey by The Council of Insurance
Agents & Brokers. Once again, employers with 50 employees
or fewer sustained the highest increases on account renewals
while the larger employers with 501 or more employees
experienced the smallest increase.
“In response to survey questions, brokers
reported that 50% of small accounts (50 or fewer employees),
42% of medium accounts (51 to 500 employees), and 19% of
large accounts (501 or more employees) experience rate
increases of 11% to 15%. In contrast, 41% of large
accounts, 34% of medium accounts, and 16% of small accounts
saw rate increases of 6% to 10%.”1 Larger accounts have
consistently been able to keep group medical rate increases
lower than the medium and smaller accounts over the past few
years. This trend is mainly due the economies of scale that
larger accounts achieve with the larger amount of employees
considered. As evidenced below, the increases have
flattened somewhat for the past year, generally increasing
from 9% to 12% depending on the size of the account.

The survey also found that
employers of all sizes are continually shifting more costs
to the employees to help restrain overall healthcare costs.
This trend includes increasing the employee share of premium
costs, raising deductibles and co-pays, and re-evaluating
drug co-pays. Only a small percentage of employers are
eliminating group medical coverage all together in order to
control costs. Employers continued to explore health
savings accounts (HSAs)
as a viable plan option or even as a plan replacement.
“Survey respondents reported that 68% [of employers of all
sizes] use it [HSA]
as a plan option, 10% to replace an existing plan, and 22%
for both.”1 Despite these responses to the survey, many
brokers still feel that the cost savings achieved through
using HSAs are
not significant enough for consumer-driven health plans.
The complexity of the concept, the education curve for
participants, and the inability to carve out prescription
plans were also cited as reasons preventing employers from
choosing the HSA
or other plan alternatives to reduce the overall costs of
group healthcare.
Group life rates, for the
most part, remained unchanged or even declined in the past
six months for most employers of all sizes due to aggressive
pricing and underwriting. “This softer marketplace was also
cited for lower rates and longer guarantee periods, with
momentum for packaging life insurance with other lines,
including medical and disability.”1 According to the table
below, group life rates have remained relatively flat or
have even decreased since the spring 2003 survey.

“The Council of Insurance
Agents & Brokers represents the leading domestic and
international commercial insurance agents and brokers who
write more than 80% of the commercial property/casualty
premiums and administer billions of dollars of employee
benefits accounts in the United States. The Council
conducts a benefits market survey twice a year, in the
spring and in the fall, to track trends in the benefits
marketplace.”1
Industry Outlook
Group medical premiums
continued to increase throughout 2006, but at a decreasing
rate, according to The Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers
fall employee benefits survey. The largest increases
continue to show up in the small accounts consisting of
companies that employ 50 or fewer individuals. Smaller
companies do not enjoy the economies of scale that the
larger companies benefit from, making it tougher to control
group medical premiums. Companies of all sizes have
continued to fight the rising cost of group medical premium
rates by implementing cost-saving strategies and passing
more of the premium cost to the employees. Higher
deductibles and health savings accounts are among many
alternatives that employers are exploring to keep costs
down, but many companies are still experiencing an increase
in premium of around 10%.
Health care costs are
expected to rise once again throughout 2007, but the
increases are projected to remain relatively stable or even
increase at a decreasing rate according to several sources.
One such source, Milliman’s fifteenth annual survey of
Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) and Preferred
Provider Organizations (PPOs), anticipated that premiums
could increase as much as 10% to 13% depending on group
experience, contract negotiations, changes in cost sharing,
and market conditions.2 The Segal Company surveyed managed
care organizations, health insurers, pharmacy benefit
managers, and third party administrators, all of which
agreed that medical plan costs and prescription drug plan
costs are likely to increase in 2007, but at lower rates
than 2006.3 Employers will continue to explore alternative
options such as higher deductibles and health savings
accounts (HSAs) to ease the pressure of rising health care
inflation and group medical premium rates. The
implementation of health and productivity management
strategies is another possible outlet that employers will
increasingly explore to hold down the costs of health care.
These strategies are being adopted by employers to encourage
employees to stay healthy and recover more quickly from
illnesses.
As was the case in group
health rates, larger employers with over 500 employees
experienced more beneficial group life account rate
changes. The smaller companies also benefited from either
flat or declining group life rates in according to the fall
CIAB benefits
survey. Group life insurance rates will continue to hold
steady or even drop throughout 2007. Increased competition
and improved underwriting practices over the years have
caused a relatively flat rate curve over the last four to
five years.
Sources:
1. The Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers Employee
Benefits Market Survey, Spring 2006
2. Milliman
2006 Group Health Insurance Survey, October 25, 2006
3. The Segal Company’s 2007 Health Plan Cost Trend
Survey |